Comments on: rorty and latour, part two http://malvasiabianca.org/archives/2005/11/rorty-and-latour-part-two/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: dana.hilliot http://malvasiabianca.org/archives/2005/11/rorty-and-latour-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-6355 dana.hilliot Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:03:38 +0000 /?p=194#comment-6355 so :) you wrote : "So I think that my view of Latour must have been tainted by my recent reading of Rorty" It should be the same for me ! how can latour say that politics of nature is "entirely again conversation" ? (I was thinking in the opposite way that all the political constitution described in the book consist in the organisation and recordings of conversations between objects/people... ) Maybe the problem consist in a mistrust from Latour relative to langage theory and nominalism ? so :)
you wrote :

“So I think that my view of Latour must have been tainted by my recent reading of Rorty”

It should be the same for me !
how can latour say that politics of nature is “entirely again conversation” ?
(I was thinking in the opposite way that all the political constitution described in the book consist in the organisation and recordings of conversations between objects/people… )

Maybe the problem consist in a mistrust from Latour relative to langage theory and nominalism ?

]]>