<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: rorty and latour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malvasiabianca.org/archives/2005/11/rorty-and-latour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malvasiabianca.org/archives/2005/11/rorty-and-latour/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dana.hilliot</title>
		<link>http://malvasiabianca.org/archives/2005/11/rorty-and-latour/comment-page-1/#comment-6354</link>
		<dc:creator>dana.hilliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=192#comment-6354</guid>
		<description>Ã´
I was googling with the words : &quot;latour + rorty&quot; cause i was thinking exactly the same as you (sorry for my horrible english, I&#039;m french)
And I found your blog...
I don&#039;t know what Latour could think about Rorty, who have not a good reputation in France (for many reasons). I&#039;m not sure Latour will recognize himself as a pragmatic in the way of Rorty. 
But I agree with you : The critic of the distinction between Nature and Culture in Latour&#039;s philosophy seem to me compatible with the rorty&#039;s critic. And they have in common the fact that they are trying to construct something after the critic (a political method for Latour and a way of life for Rorty), so they are not &quot;post-modern&quot; if this expression makes some sense.

Do you know some author who have made this connexion between Rorty and Latour ? or : are we alone ? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ã´<br />
I was googling with the words : &#8220;latour + rorty&#8221; cause i was thinking exactly the same as you (sorry for my horrible english, I&#8217;m french)<br />
And I found your blog&#8230;<br />
I don&#8217;t know what Latour could think about Rorty, who have not a good reputation in France (for many reasons). I&#8217;m not sure Latour will recognize himself as a pragmatic in the way of Rorty.<br />
But I agree with you : The critic of the distinction between Nature and Culture in Latour&#8217;s philosophy seem to me compatible with the rorty&#8217;s critic. And they have in common the fact that they are trying to construct something after the critic (a political method for Latour and a way of life for Rorty), so they are not &#8220;post-modern&#8221; if this expression makes some sense.</p>
<p>Do you know some author who have made this connexion between Rorty and Latour ? or : are we alone ? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic

Served from: malvasiabianca.org @ 2012-02-11 09:04:00 -->
