http://malvasiabianca.org/archives/2006/01/good-journalism/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://malvasiabianca.org/archives/2006/01/good-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-4386 Kim Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:47:56 +0000 http://malvasiabianca.org/?p=260#comment-4386 Although I found the article interesting, it was a bit biased and guilty of the same things it was accusing the courts of. For example, it says that it looked at 700 cases from a specific time period and an additional 200 cases that were brought to their attention. I am assuming the 200 cases were brought to their attention because there was some misconduct. It then reports that 261 cases had problems. How many of those were from the 5 year period? Is it that only 61 cases were from the five year period? I agree that this is an interesting expose and it merits attention but it seemed to be designed to just cause outrage rather than an indepth look at the system. Although I found the article interesting, it was a bit biased and guilty of the same things it was accusing the courts of. For example, it says that it looked at 700 cases from a specific time period and an additional 200 cases that were brought to their attention. I am assuming the 200 cases were brought to their attention because there was some misconduct. It then reports that 261 cases had problems. How many of those were from the 5 year period? Is it that only 61 cases were from the five year period? I agree that this is an interesting expose and it merits attention but it seemed to be designed to just cause outrage rather than an indepth look at the system.

]]>