Next, we come to a chapter full of parables. Which I was expecting to like, because I’m quite fond of stories these days; but these parables, not so much. Instead, they’re just different variants of “here are the good guys, here are the bad guys”, and while I find that less distasteful in parable form than in other forms, it’s not my favorite topic, and it’s rather repetitive even within this chapter alone.
Still, there’s something pleasantly meta about running across the parable of the sower (Matthew 13:3-9) when I myself am listening but, I have to assume, “seeing see not; and hearing [I] hear not, neither do [I] understand” (from Matthew 13:13). Also, at the end of this chapter, we see yet another take on family and group, this time leading to “A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house” (from Matthew 13:57), putting a rather poignant spin on his words on the subject in previous chapters.
Matthew 14 starts out with the beheading of John the Baptist; only a handful of verses (Matthew 14:1-12), but such is the power of the Bible that they’ve been expanded into at least one opera, and countless other works. And then some good old fashioned miracles: the loaves and the fishes (Matthew 14:15-21), and walking on water (Matthew 14:24-33). Both of which I enjoy, though I don’t think I have anything to say about them in terms of the focus of this exercise.
And, with that, we’re halfway through the 28 chapters of this book. It wouldn’t surprise me if I have less to say about the second half of the book than the first half: my guess is that we’ll be shifting into a mode with more narrative and fewer moral pronouncements. I could be wrong, though (it’s been a while since I’ve read the Bible!), and it will doubtless also be the case that the narrative itself leads to some interesting moral questions. (Indeed, perhaps when mentioning John the Baptist’s beheading, I should have delved more into Herod’s feelings in Matthew 14:9 that “And the king was sorry: nevertheless for the oath’s sake, and them which sat with him at meat, he commanded it to be given her.”) My thanks to those of you who are still with me; for those of you who are getting tired, my apologies, and rest assured that I certainly don’t expect to spend nearly as much time on the other three books.
Post Revisions:
This post has not been revised since publication.
I’m convinced the parables need to be understood completely within the context of the question of the people of god; it’s not really good guys vs. bad guys as much as its “guys who took god for granted” vs. “guys who can realize that god is asking for something new and different.”
The John the Baptist episode is, I think, all about the nature of kingship, and what a king of Judaea is/should be.
12/27/2010 @ 11:37 am
Having read further on (e.g. Matthew 21-23), I’m now of the opinion that, in passages like this, Jesus is fighting specifically with the religious old guard, not with the world at large. I wouldn’t phrase that distinction quite the way you did, but I certainly agree now that just putting it as good guys vs. bad guys isn’t right.
Can you go into more detail about your take on the John the Baptist episode? Reading on, Herod’s behavior here seems to me similar to Pilate’s behavior in Matthew 27; does that fit with your interpretation of the John the Baptist episode? (Also, does “king of Judaea” have the implication that the king in question is Jewish? Was Herod Jewish? I’ve always assumed Pilate wasn’t.)
12/27/2010 @ 12:27 pm
The Herodeans are Jewish, and allied with the temple authorities. Pilate is Roman. King of Judea is what the Magi call Jesus: the identity of the messiah with the king of Judaea is taken for granted by most Second Temple writers who write on the subject, but the death of Jesus presents serious problems for the Christian claim that Jesus was in fact both those things. Matthew is making the strong claim that Jesus was in fact both. Matthew’s Herod and Pilate display from two different perspectives (Jewish and gentile) the misunderstanding of what earthly authority is all about.
12/27/2010 @ 1:32 pm
Thanks!
12/27/2010 @ 2:30 pm